Friday, May 26, 2006

The Business of CANning SPAM

The FTC took a short break from the business of security breach enforcement to remind corporate America that commercial email (a/k/a spam) has its rules, and failing to abide by them has a price. In statement released on May 11, the FTC announced that both Kodak Imaging Network (formerly Ofoto, Inc.) and ICE.com had agreed to settle a series of CAN-SPAM charges brought against them in a pair of FTC complaints. According to the Commission, Kodak allegedly "sent a commercial e-mail message to more than two million recipients that failed to contain an opt-out mechanism, failed to disclose in the email message that consumers have the right to opt-out of receiving further mailings, and failed to include a valid physical postal address, as required by law." Meanwhile, ICE.com purportedly "sent more than 6,000 e-mail messages to consumers who had previously requested not to receive future commercial e-mail messages from the company." Neither company was hit with a very big fine ($26,331 for Kodak, and only $6,500 for ICE.com). But, in addition to agreeing not to violate CAN-SPAM again, both companies agreed to submit themselves to a series of FTC monitoring, record-keeping, and reporting provisions intended to keep them honest.
© Copyright 2006 Steptoe & Johnson LLP

GET YOUR ECOMMUNICATIONS GUIDE NOW
If you want your organisation to be compliant with South African eCommunication legislation then email us (info@vangaalenlaw.co.za ) your details (Fulle Name, name of your organisation, website address, email address and tel. no.) and we will forward you our eCommunications Guide. The eCommunication Guide will include the topic as mentioned above - "how to reflect an 'unsubscribe' opt-out function in accordance with sec. 45 of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002"

No comments: